|
|  |
| Customer Reviews: | | Average Customer Review: ( 16 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 8 found the following review helpful:
This is the Citizen Kane of films about raptors that live on islands Nov 18, 2010
By B. McGraw really the title of my review says it all.
This film depicts the delicate balance of environmental issues with a gentle hand that was lacking in the Jurassic Park series. Whereas those films settled on simply showing dinosaurs as mindless killing machines bent on destruction of the human race, Raptor Island reminds us that humans can also be mindless killing machines bent on destruction of not only their own race, but their whole world. This movie, no this FILM, goes to great lengths to really illustrate the battle between man and his environment and does so in a way that is more compelling than anything presented in Inconvenient Truth. In addition to touching on subjects of man vs. nature, the film is so bold as to also explore the battle of man vs himself. Indeed, this film goes so far as to take an in depth look at terrorism in the post 9/11 age. It does so in a way that is not sensationalist or jingoistic, but one that is brutall honest.
Why Lorenzo Lamas hasn't won an Oscar Lifetime achievement award for this movie is beyond me. Every scene he is in is riveting beyond belief. Chuck Norris does not hold a candle to Lorenzo Lamas.
The special effects are top notch. I don't understand how this has been overlooked for the past 6 years, while Avatar has garnered all sorts of critical praise. Obviously the critics are in James Cameron's pockets.
Plus, you will learn that the South Pacific Islands look strikingly similar to New Hampshire. I had absolutely no idea and I appreciate the learning experience.
5 of 6 found the following review helpful:
Raptors, raptors, Lorenzo Lamas & more raptors Dec 30, 2008
By The Straw Man
"J.E. Hoppock"
I must say that I didn't have high expectations for this movie. The first red flag was that Anchor Bay distributed this movie on DVD. God bless Anchor Bay, they release (and re-release) some of the oddest and off the cuff movies out there. Now many times odd and off the cuff can also be cheesy and corny. The second red flag is this movie was made for the Sci-Fi Channel, equating it to a direct to video movie without the bad language and nudity. Yet this movie ended up being pretty good, for what it was, cheesy and corny.
With this taken into consideration, let's enter "Raptor Island". This movie made in 2004 stars Lorenzo Lamas (in every B movie in l990s and television show Renegade) and Steven Bauer (Scarface). Well the plot is very simple, even though the movie could have been ten minutes shorter. Lorenzo Lamas is leading a Special Forces team to capture Steven Bauer and crew. The latter is a terrorist who is dealing with illegal weapons (sadly he doesn't have that much screen time). Well this chase lands the terrorists and the SF team on an island, where raptors live. To add to the mix is an undercover C.I.A. agent played by Hayley DuMond (cute) and a rouge tyrannosaurus-rex. Oh and just my personal observation, none of the characters seemed too shocked that there were prehistoric creatures living on this island.
As noted prior this is a made for TV movie, so no nudity or really bad language. However that didn't bother me, this movie was pretty much non-stop action in the sense that something was always going on. As for the dialogue, I must confess that some of it made me laugh very hard. For instance, there is a scene where Lorenzo says "Blood doesn't lie". That phrase might not make much sense in this review, but the way it is delivered in the film, HILARIAOUS!!!
The raptors themselves (as well as airplanes and boats) look like they were rejects from a Disney-Pixar movie and/or taken off a bad Playstation game. In the case of "Raptor Island" very bad special effects equals very good viewing. There are many dubious and questionable situations and character flaws. Consequently if you can believe that raptors can walk around in modern times and eat people then you should check all realism at the door.
The DVD provides a crisp picture with good sound and a chapter selection. The only special feature is a preview for "The Man with the Screaming Brain" with Bruce Campbell, not a bad movie. Overall "Raptor Island" is a low budget flick that is so cheesy that it is great. This movie would be the perfect solution for a rainy afternoon. God Bless Anchor Bay and bad CGI raptors!
9 of 12 found the following review helpful:
Take off your thinking caps for this one. Jul 12, 2008
By S. Driscoll This is one of those movies that is so bad that it can be entertaining. It has unbelievably bad continuity, plot, acting, characters, and all that "other stuff" that makes a movie good. There are some really interesting effects and dinosaurs, but it is used so horribly that at times it seems almost cartoonish.
I will attempt to summarize the movie: special forces are given the mission of rescuing UN - never mind all of that - the good guys end up fighting the bad guys while trapped on a cold, tropical, super-radioactive island, full of dinosaurs, especially raptors, in Chinese territory.
A lot of dinosaurs get shot, how I'm not sure. Through the entire movie the audience is left wondering if they were all going to accidentally shoot themselves. The guns are used as bullet sprayers, the guns are endlessly cocked, ninety-some percent of the bullets hit anything but a dinosaur, and I don't think that one dinosaur is shot when it actually comes on the scene (they have to wait for the dinosaurs to eat someone first, or something).
In the movie, none of the characters can do these things: swim, move out of harm's way, aim a gun, use their grenades, duck or hide (or otherwise take cover when necessary), tell another character critical information (at least not when they need it), etc. The bad guy is indestructible, even though everything bad seems to happen to him (wounded, irradiated, trapped with dinosaurs, lava flows, chased by special forces, etc). The dinosaurs are pretty indestructible too, even coming back to life sometimes.
Nothing in the plot makes sense. I dare you to try to make sense out of it. Overall there is a story there that sort of comes together (which I summarized earlier). Not sure where they got all that plutonium, everything is literally more radioactive than Chernobyl. Do not look for continuity, it is always missing in critical areas. My favorite part is the cartoonish helicopter. From the inside looking out, it is always "a cloudy, stormy sea at night". This is true even if from the outside they are flying during the day, or over the island, or there are no clouds in the sky and the water is perfectly still along the shore.
The most disturbing part is that a lot of the actors are literally on drugs (obviously the person putting the helicopter scenes together was). Nearly all of the guys on the ship, including the helicopter pilot, have dilated eyes, slur their lines, waver, struggling to stand and to say their lines at the same time. Not sure, but I think that sometimes they are wearing lipstick. Also, the characters act as if they are on drugs. They make irrational decisions, forget all their training, don't notice things like dinosaurs or terrorists running around them, and more than one of them decides to become dinosaur food for no apparent reason.
Overall I would have to say that this is the most entertaining "SciFi Presents" movie that I have ever seen. These same scene settings can be seen in nearly all of their movies. Instead of Russia, Europe, or wherever, this time they are supposed to be in Chinese territory - funny how it all looks like Bulgaria. Not sure how I survived watching this movie, but I should get a medal for it or something.
2 of 2 found the following review helpful:
"Does Anything On This Island Make Sense To You?" -Lorenzo Lamas Nov 01, 2010
By Robert I. Hedges Sci Fi really outdid themselves with "Raptor Island," perhaps the most formulaic dinosaur of the week movie I have ever seen. The plot is full of holes and continuity errors are abundant in this farfetched and boneheaded "trapped on an island with a ferocious predator" genre staple. The plot centers on tough naval commando Hacket (Lorenzo Lamas) attempting to rescue beautiful CIA operative Hayley DuMond (who is by fortunate coincidence the CIA's top expert on dinosaurs!) from the hands of crazed terrorist Azir (Steven Bauer) while the entire cast is being chased by some of the worst CGI dinosaurs in history. Along those lines, one of the opening credits reads "Digital Visual Effects by Unreal Productions." Now that's truth in advertising! You can't say they didn't warn you right up front.
Before you get the wrong idea, I don't hate this movie. In the right company, in fact, this can be an extremely entertaining film, albeit for all the wrong reasons. It turns out that forty years ago there was a DC-3 crash (more bogus CGI) on the island that brought a top secret US government super raptor to the island. The whole place is also a radioactive wonderland, prone to making everything into horrible mutated killing machines. (Of course.) The UN is tangentially involved and, as always, completely ineffective, providing extra intrigue to the plot (allegedly,) and ridiculous superpower conflict overtones. While all this is going on Lamas is chasing targets through the forest using his cell phone, which keeps saying "Target Acquired" but giving him no guidance...what a useful smartphone app!
When Lamas and DuMond find the wreck of the DC-3 they discover the truth behind the government program and some canisters (which look suspiciously like propane containers) containing highly radioactive material. So why mess with them? These highly trained agents don't mind exposure to weapons grade plutonium? Because the plot was too coherent, a volcano suddenly erupts, and DuMond finds the raptor's spawning cave (enjoy the puppy-sized raptors.) I was hoping that the super-annoying CIA operative would be eaten by creatures, so annoying is she, but it turns out sometimes things don't end up like you want them to. Shortly after the vulcanism subplot began, the operation also became imperiled by a typhoon, and I started to think that "Raptor Island" was too mundane for a film of this scope, and that a better and more accurate title would have been "Terrorists Versus Special Forces Versus The United Nations Versus Dinosaurs Versus The Typhoon Versus The Volcano." Of course that would be harder to fit on a marquee.
You know the film must be amazingly bad when Lorenzo Lamas is unquestionably the best actor giving the most nuanced performance in the film (especially when compared to Bauer and DuMond,) but the filmmakers are not done with their humorous tale quite yet. After some (more) ridiculous dialogue ("So what do we do?"..."We trust our instincts.") it becomes clear that the volcano is now as big a threat as the dinosaurs and the terrorists; the immortal exchange "You mean this whole place is gonna' blow?"..."All of it!" occurs, making me laugh, because I thought that there was a scintilla more truth in advertising there and that they were talking about the rest of the movie. Maybe I was just projecting my interpretation onto the dialogue, though. Accompanied by some truly tortuous backstory conversation, Lamas and DuMond rub sulfurous mud (!) all over themselves, matching their own scents to the odor of the movie. This protects them from being smelled by the dinosaurs, you see.
In the stirring conclusion they decide to detonate a string of charges around the nest, but it may make the whole unstable island explode. There's explosions, lurking terrorists, lava running everywhere, a bold helicopter rescue wherein the helicopter has to fly in a dreadfully vicious storm (despite it obviously being a calm day in the exterior shots.) This scene had a lot of parallels to the classic day versus night technique of the great Ed Wood. When the final drama involving whether or not to let Azir be eaten, the peculiar decisions about when and how to use signal flares (answer: unlike any actual human ever would,) and the ultimate and utterly predictable destruction of the island finally plays out on the screen, it's a good feeling, a feeling of pride, a feeling of accomplishment: you have made it through a film where few would dare to tread, and fewer still could make it to the end.
In all truth, "Raptor Island" is vacuous but entertaining if you want to see a totally ridiculous monster-terrorist-espionage thriller with a hilariously outlandish premise and more ludicrous plotpoint coincidences than most any other film in its class. Dinosaurs have never been so funny.
2 of 2 found the following review helpful:
Raptor Island... When videogames go bad. Feb 21, 2010
By Julian Kennedy Raptor Island: 1 out of 10: The Sci-fi channel has produced some stinkers (Boa vs. Python, Boa vs. Cobra, and Feather Boa vs. Mink) but Raptor Island easily eclipses all of them. There simply are not movies this bad outside of a Lionsgate home movie film festival.
Where can one begin? The special effects have to be seen to be believed. The entire film is in CGI (except for Lorenzo Lamas who is decidedly not animated) and it couldn't be more poorly done. Remember those old prehistoric planet movies from the sixties where they would superimpose some iguana stock footage attacking some middle aged vaudeville guys dressed as caveman? Raptor Island lowers that bar considerably.
The raptors seem to have been ported from an old Saturn CD-Rom game. They have five distinct frames of animation each and blink in and out of the picture. Gunshots are represented by graphics that would make House of the Dead weep and the raptors when shot ignore the bullets then fall down.
The raptors are perhaps the stupidest creatures ever shown on film ignoring actors and each other as they gaze off into the distance with bloody mouths that look like a five year old got into mommy's make-up box.
Add other equally bad CGI rendered sand, ships and planes and one really wishes the MST3000 crew would come back for an encore anniversary show.
With very badly rendered monsters and a throwaway script one could at least hope for something gratuitous to liven things up. (You know a decapitation scene or skinny dipping scene or a combination of the two.) Raptor Island provides nothing of the sort. This is family friendly entertainment. But only if you really really hate your family.
See all 16 customer reviews on Amazon.com
|
The
Importance Of Lighting In Interior Design
by Jessica Ackerman
Everyone knows how important
paint color, furniture choices and artwork are to
interior design. One aspect of design that is often
overlooked, however, is lighting. Lighting not only
affects the brightness of the room, but it can also
change the way a paint color looks, cast shadows in ways
that make the room seem smaller and have an impact on
the presentation of art work.
There is no light like
natural light. If you are buying, building or
remodeling, opt for as much natural light as possible.
Oversized windows and skylights are two ways to get the
most natural light. Of course, not everyone is in the
position to be able to do that, so you'll have to work
with what you have.
How much natural light do
you get in your room? If the room in question faces
north, you won't get as much natural sunlight as you
would in a southern facing room. Rooms that face south
get bright, natural light throughout the day. Rooms that
face east will only have good natural light in the
morning hours and western facing rooms will have the
most light during the afternoon.
Once you are familiar
with how much natural light is in each room, you'll be
able to make informed choices about what additional
lighting may be necessary. Keep in mind that rooms with
little or no natural light will need artificial lighting
- even during the day - in order to look their best.
Here are some types of lighting to consider.
1. Accent Lighting
Accent lighting is
perfect when you want to showcase a piece of art or a
special piece of furniture or other item. Since light
draws the eye, it will bring attention to the features
in your room that you wish to highlight.
2. Hanging Light Features
Chandeliers and smaller
hanging lamps can be beautiful as well as functional. A
trip to the local home improvement store will quickly
show you how overwhelming the choices can be. You'll
want to select lighting that blends in with your
existing dÃÂécor. For example, a crystal chandelier in a
country themed dining room probably isn't the best
option. If you don't choose carefully, your lighting may
stick out like a sore thumb and become more of an
eyesore than a lovely accent.
3. Recessed Lighting
Recessed lighting is a
good choice for a room that needs extra light throughout
the day. Because the lighting won't interfere with the
existing decor, it can work in almost any room. It
provides abundant light without taking up a lot of space
or interfering with other aspects of the room.
4. Lamps
Using lamps are a way to
add not only additional lighting, but also punches of
color. If possible, see how much light the lamp gives
off before leaving the store. Many lamps serve as
decoration more than as a light source and give off very
little light. If you love the lamp, but it doesn't give
off quite enough light, consider changing the shade
which will usually solve the problem.
When decorating your
home, remember how important lighting is, and give it
the same thought and attention you give to the other
details of decorating your home.
About the Author
Jessica Ackerman is the
featured author at Wall DÃÂécor and Home Accents. Shop today
for great deals on
metal wall sculpture ,
home
accents and more unique wall dÃÂécor products.
|
|
|  | |
|
|