|
|  |
| Customer Reviews: | | Average Customer Review: ( 48 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
44 of 48 found the following review helpful:
Very very bad Jun 20, 2005
By The Bus I won't go into a summary of the plot. I admit I rented this without even reading what it was about, just because it was a Seagal movie.
I didn't have high expectations. Even so...
After about 30 minutes I gave up.
First off, for those of you who actually watch it, what's up with the super-dooper fakey spy plane in the beginning? The planes in "Team America" looked more realistic than this garbage.
Also, they can afford to have a helicopter to shoot scenes in, but the background is so obviously computer generated? What a joke.
And once again I wondered what the heck was going on when every scene that required a voice over dub by seagal was done by somebody who sounded NOTHING like seagal.
Fighting? Not in this movie. Lots and lots of shooting though. For so called best-of-the-best professional soldiers, they couldn't hit the walls of a barn if they were standing inside the barn. There's one scene in which 200+ of the baddies with automatic weapons and a TANK are being held off by like 4 or 5 goodies with automatic machine-pistols. They're in a tunnel, like 100 feet from each other, firing hundreds if not thousands of rounds and like nobody gets hit? What a joke. One of the boring-ist scenes I've ever had to sit through. That's about when I called it quits.
This movie is garbage. It's pure poop. It's too bad also, because even though everything since "Exit Wounds" in my opinion was poop, "Into The Sun" I thought was actually pretty good.
I'll keep renting his movies just in the hopes that someday I'll actually enjoy one of his movies once again. So I suppose they'll keep churning out this poop because people like me will keep renting them. I'd imagine that they'll rent good, but I can't imagine any of his newer movies are being actually purchased. I guess his career is over, and I should get over it. But I'll keep up hope for now that someday, somebody will actually put this over-the-hill out-of-shape former-bad-a** into a decent movie.
Until then, we'll always have "out for justice" :) Anybody here seen richie?
19 of 20 found the following review helpful:
Total Excrement! Dec 03, 2005
By Living in Budapest
"livinginhungary"
As a Seagal fan I have to say that this direct-to-toilet DVD ranks high on my all-time worst film list. Seagal started getting pretty bad when he released The Patriot. Between that horrible film and Submerged Seagal has released a few decent direct-to-video films. Submerged is not one of them. The sound quality on Submerged was awful. It's bad enough trying to understand what Seagal says with his mumbling (or the dubbing), but my wife and I found ourselves turning the volume up and down depending on the scene. While you don't really buy these films for the plot, you expect at least a minimal storyline...not with Submerged! We gave up on Submerged less than 15 minutes into the film. Unless your a Seagal fan and feel the overwhelming compulsion to add to your collection, do not buy this DVD!!! If you're not a fan, don't even bother renting (or borrowing from a friend)!
11 of 11 found the following review helpful:
"We're Submerged." "So Am I!" Terreible Action from Steven Seagal Feb 26, 2006
By Tsuyoshi These days no one would expect much from direct-to-video films starring Steven Seagal. It was only five years ago (in 2001) when his `Exit Wounds' hit No. 1 in the US box office chart, and thanks to DMX that was a decent action film. It was a long time ago.
`Submerged' is yet another B-film from Millennium Films directed by Anthony Hichox, known for B-horror/action films like `Waxwork' and `Jill Rips.' If you have seen the latter one featuring another direct-to-video star Dolph Lundgren (remember?), you know what you will see in `Submerged.' I can write it with one word - TERRIBLE.
[BAD ACTIONS] `Submerged' has a wide assortment of terrible actions and vapid shoot-outs, plus incomprehensible story no one can understand, and as if they are not enough, very bad acting too. The last one could be forgiven if only Steven Seagal had listened to the advice of the people who know filmmaking better, and tried to lose some weight to look more like `action star' as he did before shooting `Exit Wounds.' Apparently he is too busy to do that, making as many as three or four films in a year.
[BAD STORY] Now `Submerged' seems to be about the conspiracy in South America, where some terrible plot is going on, It looks like someone is using the high tech called "mind control" for no other reason than making some money. And this is yet to be confirmed, but someone is giving a help to the scientist to do a profitable business or something.
[BAD, BAD, BAD] Add to this clichéd story, laconic Steven Seagal as `Cody' our hero released from the prison. As always, Chris Cody is assigned a mission from US Navy to attack the secret laboratory of the doctor. Chris Cody leads his `Dirty-Dozen' team only to find bits of tired actions, like bits of submarine scenes (where cheap version of `Under Siege' can be seen briefly), and another cheap version of Doris Day's `The Man Who Knew Too Much' with confusing editing and meaningless conclusion.
[AND TRIVIA] Usually this kind of action is made with several set-pieces. If they are well-crafted, the numerous plot holes or bad acting can be ignored. In `Submerged' as the title suggests, everything - car crash, explosions (including that of miniatures), and shoot-outs are badly shot and poorly edited. You see distorted, cheesy CGI of `visions' of the brainwashed, or inexplicable fast-forward and slow motions, but they just don't make any sense. The fact that Hichox's mother Anne V. Coates is a respected film editor and four-time Oscar nominee (most recently for `Out of Sight') only makes me very sad about the poorly done editing of `Submerged.'
And as to Steven Seagal, what can I say? His acting is lazy and his action is slack, as if he doesn't want to do anything. Even the film's `Uruguay' is in fact Bulgaria, so no exotic location can be enjoyed. In short, this is a truly terrible film with no redeeming merits. Forget all about it.
10 of 11 found the following review helpful:
Have another doughnut Steven, you fat Ba$tarD! Jun 21, 2005
By sinisterfiend666 WOW, Steven is done! His career is over with! I kid you not. I have always said that I think B-action movies are way worse than B-horror movies and this is proof. It has generic explosions, bad acting, bad actions sequences, and generic noise FX. I just recently rented a new Jean-Claude Van Damme movie thinking Jean was getting a little washed up, but he is not even close to being as bad as Steven in this movie! Steven is poorly groomed, he is fat and looks like a drunk. In many of the scenes in this movie he is sitting down so he doesn't get out of breath. I was laughing all the way through this. I said to myself "if he starts doing his karate he does in all his movie, I am going to fall out of my chair laughing" (because he is too fat) and sure enough he did! You would have to see it to believe it. He goes to karate kick a guy and literally looks like he has trouble lifting up his fat leg. He also wares super baggy cloths to try and hide his weight and it actually makes him look even bigger. This movie is awful! I should add that it also has some of the worst one liner's I have ever heard. Don't expect no "go ahead... make my day" kind of stuff! Here is an example of one of the lines in this movie: Steven looks at a girl and says "some sick s*** went on in here alligator!" Not to mention Steven's poor attempt at sounding like a rapper gangster with is poorly constructed Ebonics street talk. He sounds illiterate.
Verdict: rent at your own risk
6 of 6 found the following review helpful:
Oh... my... God... Feb 23, 2006
By Kevin First, let me say I'm a HUGE Seagal fan... I'm a sucker for a good action movie, and Seagal is about as good as it's ever gotten. I even love his current string of straight-to-DVD-movies.
"Into The Sun" and "The Foreigner" were classic Seagal. "Out For A Kill" and "Belly Of The Beast" were also very good action movies. No quite as good as his early work, but life does go on for everyone.
That said... this movie was HORRIBLE... I'm ashamed to be a Seagal fan when I watch this... who came up with this script? Was it two teenagers smoking pot in a basement?
The special effects were ok, but the fight scenes were tired. This is the first film I've seen where Seagal actually looked his age (The guy is in his 50's).
There were two major problems I had with this movie.
Number one: The set. Who was in charge of making this set look realistic? The only thing that came close was the submarine scenes, but then, I've never really spent time on one. The scenes in the field, when the teams got ambushed looked like they were filmed in my backyard.
Number two: The voice. Who dubbed Seagal's voice? His actual voice is in the mix in the beginning and in the end, but during the film... the voice sounds like it belongs to a guy who should be on a horse in Texas. You'd think they'd find a voice that fits.
I'm a huge Steven Seagal fan... but this is the only movie I've ever seen him in that I don't want to watch... ever again.
Want to see it? Don't waste your money... wait for it to play on the USA Network. (Almost every other Sunday)
See all 48 customer reviews on Amazon.com
|
The
Importance Of Lighting In Interior Design
by Jessica Ackerman
Everyone knows how important
paint color, furniture choices and artwork are to
interior design. One aspect of design that is often
overlooked, however, is lighting. Lighting not only
affects the brightness of the room, but it can also
change the way a paint color looks, cast shadows in ways
that make the room seem smaller and have an impact on
the presentation of art work.
There is no light like
natural light. If you are buying, building or
remodeling, opt for as much natural light as possible.
Oversized windows and skylights are two ways to get the
most natural light. Of course, not everyone is in the
position to be able to do that, so you'll have to work
with what you have.
How much natural light do
you get in your room? If the room in question faces
north, you won't get as much natural sunlight as you
would in a southern facing room. Rooms that face south
get bright, natural light throughout the day. Rooms that
face east will only have good natural light in the
morning hours and western facing rooms will have the
most light during the afternoon.
Once you are familiar
with how much natural light is in each room, you'll be
able to make informed choices about what additional
lighting may be necessary. Keep in mind that rooms with
little or no natural light will need artificial lighting
- even during the day - in order to look their best.
Here are some types of lighting to consider.
1. Accent Lighting
Accent lighting is
perfect when you want to showcase a piece of art or a
special piece of furniture or other item. Since light
draws the eye, it will bring attention to the features
in your room that you wish to highlight.
2. Hanging Light Features
Chandeliers and smaller
hanging lamps can be beautiful as well as functional. A
trip to the local home improvement store will quickly
show you how overwhelming the choices can be. You'll
want to select lighting that blends in with your
existing dÃÂécor. For example, a crystal chandelier in a
country themed dining room probably isn't the best
option. If you don't choose carefully, your lighting may
stick out like a sore thumb and become more of an
eyesore than a lovely accent.
3. Recessed Lighting
Recessed lighting is a
good choice for a room that needs extra light throughout
the day. Because the lighting won't interfere with the
existing decor, it can work in almost any room. It
provides abundant light without taking up a lot of space
or interfering with other aspects of the room.
4. Lamps
Using lamps are a way to
add not only additional lighting, but also punches of
color. If possible, see how much light the lamp gives
off before leaving the store. Many lamps serve as
decoration more than as a light source and give off very
little light. If you love the lamp, but it doesn't give
off quite enough light, consider changing the shade
which will usually solve the problem.
When decorating your
home, remember how important lighting is, and give it
the same thought and attention you give to the other
details of decorating your home.
About the Author
Jessica Ackerman is the
featured author at Wall DÃÂécor and Home Accents. Shop today
for great deals on
metal wall sculpture ,
home
accents and more unique wall dÃÂécor products.
|
|
|  | |
|
|